Teachers’ Perception of Anchoring Phenomenon and Its Effect on Students’ Science Proficiency: An Input for a Training Program
Vol. 7 (2023), Articles
Vol. 7 (2023)

Teachers’ Perception of Anchoring Phenomenon and Its Effect on Students’ Science Proficiency: An Input for a Training Program

Articles
https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v7i1.101
Published 2023-11-01
Mercy Alzate-Lynch
Cagayan State University
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9562-1146
PDF

Keywords

Anchoring phenomenon,
science proficiency
perception
science units
descriptive quantitative
Maryland
USA

How to Cite

Alzate-Lynch, M. (2023). Teachers’ Perception of Anchoring Phenomenon and Its Effect on Students’ Science Proficiency: An Input for a Training Program. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 7(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v7i1.101
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

This study explored teachers' perception of anchoring phenomena and its impact on students' science proficiency at Thomas Stone and Port Towns Elementary School in Prince George's County during the 2022-2023 school year. The research instrument was rigorously tested for reliability, and ethical clearance was obtained. Results indicate that most teachers have a positive interest in science, demonstrate mastery in teaching phenomena, and frequently incorporate anchoring phenomena in their science lessons. Students generally meet expectations in earth and space science, physical science, engineering, and technology but partially meet expectations in life science. The study also reveals a significant correlation between teachers' experience and their perception of anchoring phenomena. Furthermore, teachers' perception of anchoring phenomena significantly influences students' proficiency in all science units. These findings have implications for teacher training programs and the widespread adoption of the Anchoring Phenomenon approach in science education. One of the recommendations is to establish a teacher mentorship program and mentor-mentee training to maximize the use of anchoring phenomena. Additionally, a comprehensive review of life science lesson implementation is suggested to enhance pedagogical approaches in teaching life sciences.
https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v7i1.101
PDF

References

Brau, B. (2018). Constructivism. In R. Kimmons, The Students' Guide to Learning Design and Research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/studentguide/constructivism.

Chaudhari, S. (2018). Descriptive Statistics. Toward Data Science.

DeBoer, G. E. (2011, June 21). The Globalization of Science Education. Wiley Online Library. Retrieved October 20, 2020, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/tea.20421.

Hein, G. E. (1991). Constructivist learning theory. Exploratorium. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716831-5.

Huncosky, K. (n.d.). Phenomena-Based Instruction in the K–12 Classroom. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from https://s3.amazonaws.com/ecommerceprod.mheducation.com/unitas/school/explore/sites/inspire-science/phenomena-based-instruction-k-12-classroom-white-paper.pdf.

Inferential statistics. Inferential Statistics - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. (n.d.). Retrieved: February 6, 2022, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry.

Lead State: Maryland. NGSS. (2017, March). Retrieved December 10, 2021, from

https://www.nextgenscience.org/lead-state-Maryland.

Lowerre, R. C. (2011). Perceptions of Teachers Regarding the Importance and Existence of Researched-Based Program Characteristics in Alternative High Schools and Teacher's Perception of Efficacy in the Commonwealth of Virginia (dissertation). ProQuest, Ann Arbor, MI.

Mattila, P., & Silander, P. (Eds.). (2014). How to create the school of the future: Revolutionary thinking and design from Finland. Oulu: University of Oulu, Center for Internet Excellence.

NGSS District Implementation Indicators. www.nextgenscience.org/. Retrieved December 4, 2021, from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites.

NGSS. (2013). Nextgenscience.Org/Standards/Standards. https://www.nextgenscience.org.

Perkins, D., & Salomon, G. (1999). Transfer of Learning. Transfer of Learning, 3–10. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/view.doc.

Phenomena. (n.d.). Https://Www.Nextgenscience.Org/Resources/Phenomena. Retrieved January 4, 2021, from https://www.nextgenscience.org/resources/phenomena.

Phenomenon-based learning. www.Phenomenaleducation.Info/Phenomenon-Based-Learning.Html. Retrieved December 23, 2020, from http://www.phenomenaleducation.info/phenomenon-base.

Science Education. (2013). Https://En.Wikipedia.Org/Wiki/Science_education.

Silander, P. (2015b). Rubric for Phenomenon Based Learning. Retrieved January 25, 2021, from http://www.phenomenaleducation.info/phenomenon-based-learning.html.

Taber, K. S. (2011). Constructivism as educational theory: Contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction. In J. Hassaskhah (Ed.), Educational Theory. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

Simonides, V., & Schwarz, J. F. (n.d.). Phenomenological perspective on teaching and learning encompassing holistic phenomena. Recent program reform in Finland. Education Forum. doi: https://www.forumoswiatowe.pl.

The Next Generation Science Standards Executive Summary. (n.d.). Retrieved February 6, 2021, from https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Fina.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R.W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, 1, Problems of general. New York, NY: Plenum Press