Keywords
human resources
human resource management systems
software quality standards
How to Cite
Abstract
The application of a human resource management system has improved organizational performance in delivering their frontline service. This study analyzed the existing human resource management process of Kalinga State University to identify the issues and concerns arising from their manual process. Through this gap, the study designed, developed, and implemented a Human Resource Management System to address such. The study employed a software development lifecycle as its research design to provide a detailed and accurate development of the system in aligning the existing HR processes with the university’s strategic objectives. The findings of the study showed that there is a significant difference between the use of the manual HR process and the human resource management system. The study employed a survey questionnaire to evaluate the system, and the data gathered were treated using descriptive statistics. To determine the degree of compliance with standards, the study utilized the IS0 25010 Software Quality Standards. The development of the HRMS has indeed resulted in a significant improvement in the university HR process. This suggests that the HRM addressed inefficiency previously identified in the manual HR process.References
Altarawneh, I., & Al-Shqairat, Z. (2010). Human resource information systems in Jordanian universities. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(10), 113-127.
Ball, K. S. (2001). The use of human resource information systems: A survey. Personnel Review, 30(6), 677-693.
Bamel, U. K., Sahay, V., & Thite, M. (2014). Development and validation of human resource information system (HRIS) scale. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22(3), 237-256.
Bechers, B., & Bsat, M. Z. (2002). Human resource information systems: A review and model development. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 10(1), 86-103.
Dulebohn, J. H., & Johnson, R. D. (2013). Human resource metrics and decision support: A classification framework. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 71-83.
Kavanagh, M. J., Thite, M., & Johnson, R. D. (2014). Human resource information systems: Basics, applications, and future directions. Sage Publications.
Kovach, K. A., & Cathcart, C. E. (1999). Human resource information systems (HRIS): Providing business with rapid data access, information exchange, and strategic advantage. Public Personnel Management, 28(2), 275-282.
Lal, K. (2015). Adoption of human resource information systems in organizations. Journal of Business and Management, 17(1), 50-56.
Ngai, E. W., & Wat, F. K. (2006). Human resource information systems: A review and empirical analysis. Personnel Review, 35(3), 297-314.
Rawat, B. (2008). Human resource management system: A holistic approach. Journal of Management Research, 8(2), 78-88.
Sagum, B. S. (2015). Factors affecting the adoption of human resource information systems in higher education institutions. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(28), 35-41.
Tannenbaum, S. I. (1990). Human resource information systems: User group implications. Journal of Systems Management, 41(1), 27-32.
Targowski, A., & Deshpande, S. (2001). The utility and selection of an HRIS. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 9(1), 42-56.
Thite, M., Kavanagh, M. J., & Johnson, R. D. (2012). Evolution of human resource management and human resource information systems: The role of information technology. Sage Publications.
Ulrich, D. (1997). Human resource champions: The next agenda for adding value and delivering results. Harvard Business Press.