Keywords
Kalinga
family justice system
qualitative
Philippines
How to Cite
Abstract
This study explored the experiences of Indigenous families in the family justice system of marriage and child support from the perspective views of legal and frontline family justice personnel. It employed the qualitative study adapting the phenological approach. An interview guide was used to elicit the necessary information. The researcher used video recording and audio recording to document the responses of the participants of the study and used thematic analysis to analyze the data gathered. Based on the study results, the system promotes peace & order and resolves conflict easily, which is the main objective of the Bodong Justice system in general. In addition, it gives an opportunity for the less fortunate to settle disputes in a very bureaucratic way of the formal court. However, it has been noticed that some are still misguided on the process, especially today’s youth who were raised in the modern way of life and were not brought up by the traditional ways and culture due to modernization.References
Agosto, E., Ajmar, A., Boccardo, P., Tonolo, F. G., & Lingua, A. (2008). Crime scene reconstruction using a fully geomatic approach. Sensors, 8, 6280–6302. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8106280
American Bar Association. (2013). In Poje, J. (Ed.), ABA Legal Technology Survey Report. Volume VI: Mobile Lawyers.
Arcilla Jr, F. E., Arcilla, M. E., & Cabana, V. G. (2019). Assessment of the Talaandig knowledge of good and evil. SMCC Higher Education Research Journal (Business Administration Journal), 1 (1).
Bailenson, J. N., Blasovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Noveck, B. (2006). Courtroom applications of virtual environments, immersive virtual environments and collaborative virtual environments. Law and Policy, 28(2), 249–270.
Burton, A., Schofield, D., & Goodwin, L. (2005). Gates of global perception: forensic graphics for evidence presentation. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (pp. 103–111). ACM Press.
Chan, A. (2005). The use of low-cost virtual reality and digital technology to aid forensic scene interpretation and recording (Doctoral dissertation, Cranfield University).
Dahir, V. B. (2011). Chapter 3: Digital visual evidence. In Henderson, C., & Epstein, E. J. (Eds.), The future of evidence: how science and technology will change the practice of law (pp. 77–112). American Bar Association.
Dunn, M. A., Salovey, P., & Feigenson, N. (2006). The jury persuaded (and not): computer animation in the courtroom. Law and Policy, 28(2), 228–248.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage.
Howard, T. L. J., Murta, A. D., & Gibson, S. (2000). Virtual environments for the scene of crime reconstruction and analysis. In Proceedings of SPIE - International Society for Optical Engineering.
Kassin, S., & Dunn, M. A. (1997). Computer-animated displays and the jury: facilitative and prejudicial effects. Law and Human Behavior, 21(3), 269–281.
Krieger, R. (1992). Sophisticated computer graphics come of age—and evidence will never be the same. Journal of the American Bar Association, 93–95.
Kuehn, P. F. (1999). Maximizing your persuasiveness: effective computer-generated exhibits. DCBA Brief Journal of DuPage County Bar Association, 12, 1999–2000.
Lederer, F. I. (1994). Technology comes to the courtroom. Emory Law Journal, 43, 1095–1122.
Lederer, F. I., & Solomon, S. H. (1997). Courtroom technology – an introduction to the onrushing future. In Faculty Publications. 1653.
Leveson, B. (2015). Review of efficiency in criminal proceedings by the Rt Hon Sir Brian Leveson. Judiciary of England and Wales.