Abstract
This study aimed to explore the level of motivation and job satisfaction and their relationship to performance in the Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Community Environment and Natural Resources Office (DENR-CENRO). A descriptive-correlational research design was utilized to analyze employees' profiles, work environments, and levels of motivation and job satisfaction in relation to their performance. Data were gathered using a structured questionnaire as the main instrument. The findings reveal that respondents expressed satisfaction with the nature of their work in their current roles. Additionally, employees consistently demonstrated high levels of motivation concerning performance assessments, indicating that they were performing their duties effectively. Respondents also reported being consistently motivated by the benefits and incentives provided, which corresponded to a high level of job satisfaction in these areas. The results suggest that employees are satisfied with the overall benefits and incentives offered by the organization. A significant difference in motivation levels was observed when employees were grouped by job designation. Employees' levels of motivation appeared to vary depending on their job titles or positions within the organization, highlighting the potential influence of designation on motivational factors. Similarly, significant differences were found in job satisfaction levels when employees were grouped by profile, further emphasizing the role of job designations in influencing satisfaction. These findings indicate that organizational practices, such as tailoring benefits and incentives and understanding variations in motivation across different roles, can significantly impact employee performance and satisfaction. The study underscores the importance of addressing the diverse needs of employees to foster motivation and enhance organizational success.References
Abid, G. (2019). Contextual factors and organizational commitment: Examining the mediating role of thriving at work. Sustainability, 11(17), 4686.
Al-Abdullat, B. M., & Dababneh, A. (2018). The mediating effect of job satisfaction on the relationship between organizational culture and knowledge management in Jordanian banking companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, (just-accepted), 00–00.
Armstrong, M. (2006). A handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Limited.
Aziri, B. (2011). Job satisfaction: A literature review. Management Research and Practice, 3(4), 77–86.
Barney, E. C., & Steven Elias, M. S. (2010). Flex-time as a moderator of the job stress-work motivation relationship: A three-nation investigation. Personnel Review, 39(4), 487–502.
Bell, B. S., & Ford, J. K. (2007). Reactions to skill assessment: The forgotten factor in explaining motivation to learn. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(1), 33–62.
Beretti, A., Figuières, C., & Grolleau, G. (2013). Using money to motivate both ‘saints’ and ‘sinners’: A field experiment on motivational crowding-out. Kyklos, 66(1), 63–77.
Carlsen, C. (2003). Work motivation theories and practices: A review.
De Simone, S. (2015). Expectancy theory and employee motivation. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(19), 222–228.
Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2010). Exploring the relative and combined influence of mastery-approach goals and work intrinsic motivation on employee turnover intention. Personnel Review, 39(5), 622–638.
Eberendu, A., & Okere, P. (2015). Motivational strategies and employee productivity: The case of selected companies. International Journal of Business and Management, 3(5), 45–56.
Gammill, J. (2015). The effects of socio-economic status on student achievement: Perspectives from high schools. Educational Research Quarterly, 38(4), 3–20.
Hughes, Claire, Lee, Jun-ho, and Gomez, Ana. (2018). Workplace relations, morale, and performance: A team perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(6), 789–806. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/job.2278
Jyoti, Jeevan, and Rani, Rashmi. (2017). Exploring the impact of transformational leadership and organizational learning on organizational performance. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(3), 235–250. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-07-2016-0070
Karam, Elias P., Hu, Jia, Davison, Robert B., Juravich, Matthew, Nahrgang, Jennifer D., Humphrey, Stephen E., & Scott DeRue, D. (2018). Illuminating the ‘face’ of justice: A meta‐analytic examination of leadership and organizational justice. Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), 134–171. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12402
Manganelli, Simone, Cavicchiolo, Elisa, Mallia, Lidia, Biasi, Valerio, Lucidi, Fabio, & Alivernini, Fabio. (2019). The interplay between self-determined motivation, self-regulated cognitive strategies, and prior achievement in predicting academic performance. Educational Psychology, 39(4), 470–488. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1572104
Nicolescu, Ovidiu, & Verboncu, Ion. (2008). Fundamentals of organizational performance.
Ozyilmaz, A., Erdogan, B., & Karaeminogullari, Ayca. (2018). Trust in organization and employee performance: Examining a multi-level model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1247–1261. http://doi.org/10.1002/job.2293
Potnuru, R. K. G., Sahoo, C. K., & Sharma, R. (2019). Knowledge sharing and employee empowerment: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 955–974. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0734
Ran, Ayodele. (2009). Employee motivation and productivity in modern organizations.
Sousa, Maria J., & Rocha, Álvaro. (2019). Leadership styles and employee performance: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2556.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02556
Wolniak, Ryszard, & Olkiewicz, Marian. (2019). The impact of job satisfaction on employee performance. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 25(4), 621–629. http://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1486016
Zaccaro, Stephen J., Green, John P., Dubrow, Samantha, & Kolze, Michael. (2018). Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 2–43.