Abstract
This study investigated the link between metacognitive reading strategies and the academic profile of Senior High School students. Using a descriptive-correlational research design, the study examined how learners employ global, problem-solving, and support reading strategies, as measured by the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI). A stratified random sample of 56 students from the HUMSS, STEM, ABM, and TVL strands participated. Findings revealed that learners moderately utilized global and support strategies, such as previewing texts, contextualization, note-taking, and paraphrasing, suggesting a developing but inconsistent application of strategic reading approaches. In contrast, problem-solving strategies, including re-reading, adjusting reading speed, and visualizing, were highly employed, showing that students actively manage comprehension difficulties. Differences were significant in relation to available reading materials at home and time spent reading, highlighting the influence of environmental factors on strategy use. The study concluded that while students demonstrated strength in problem-solving strategies, there is a need to reinforce global and support strategies to develop more balanced metacognitive awareness. These findings underscore the importance of reading instruction that models and cultivates strategic reading behaviors across academic strands. By linking students’ reading strategies with their academic profile, the study provides valuable insights into how literacy instruction can be enhanced to improve comprehension, promote independent learning, and strengthen overall academic achievement among Senior High School learners.References
Acmed-Ismael, F. S. (2021). Metacognitive learning strategies: Their effects on the reading comprehension performance of grade five pupils. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation.
Arini, S. (2018). Metacognitive reading strategies used by the fifth semester of English teacher education department students in academic year 2015–2016 [Unpublished undergraduate thesis]. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
Babayiğit, O. (2019). Examination of the metacognitive reading strategies of secondary school sixth grade students. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(1), 1–14.
Dayag-Tungpalan, M. L. (2023). Metacognitive strategies and perceived factors affecting the speaking performance of ESL learners. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 14(2), 547–556.
Fitrisia, D., Tan, K. E., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2015). Investigating metacognitive awareness of reading strategies to strengthen students’ performance in reading comprehension. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 30, 15–30.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Furber, S. (2016). Teaching students to read metacognitively. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/teaching-students-read-metacognitively
Hamiddin, H., & Saukah, A. (2020). Investigating metacognitive knowledge in reading comprehension: The case of Indonesian undergraduate students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 608–615. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i3.23211
MacKenzie, T. (2019). Teaching students to read metacognitively. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/teaching-students-read-metacognitively
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
Rajoo, F. X. A. S., & Selvaraj, B. (2010). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. In 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR 2010) (pp. 1301–1304). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSSR.2010.5773739

