Keywords
teaching strategies
instructional materials
computer education
junior high school
How to Cite
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between professional preparation, teaching strategies, and the adequacy of instructional materials in the context of teaching computer subjects in Philippine junior high schools. Set against a backdrop of rapid technological integration in global education systems, the research focuses on junior high school teachers at Cagayan National High School. The study employs a descriptive-correlational design to investigate how teachers' educational backgrounds, training, and access to resources influence their instructional strategies and, in turn, impact student learning outcomes. Through quantitative analysis, key findings reveal that professional preparation, characterized by formal education and ICT-related training, has a significant impact on teaching strategies, including collaborative learning, multimedia integration, and hands-on simulations. However, disparities in resource availability, especially instructional materials, underscore challenges that limit optimal teaching outcomes, highlighting the need for targeted interventions. The findings underscore the necessity for comprehensive professional development and adequate instructional materials to ensure effective computer education in junior high schools. This study provides recommendations for educational policymakers to enhance resource allocation and training programs that align with the evolving demands of the digital learning environment.References
Adu, E. I., & Abe, T. O. (2013). Influence of Qualification on Development and
and Technology in Online Professional Development for Teachers of German. Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 46(2), 130-147.
Andrews, D., & Lewis, M. (2002). The Experience of a Professional Community:
Assessment of Computer Programmed Instructional Package on Energy Concept in Upper Basic Technology in Ekiti State. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 3, 611-618.
Associates.
Barlongo, C. J. (2015). Reforms in the Philippine Education System: The K to 12
Belawati, T. (2004). UNESCO Meta-Survey on the Use of Technologies in Education, ICT Use in Education in the Philippines. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001349/134960e.pdf
Berry, B., Johnson, D., & Montgomery, D. (2005). The Power of Teacher Leadership.
Braincuber Technologies Pvt Ltd. (2020). Blended learning: Combining traditional and digital methods. Braincuber.
Bustamante, C., & Moeller, A. J. (2013). The Convergence of Content, Pedagogy,
Cahapay, M. B., & Anoba, L. D. (2021). Teacher self-efficacy and ICT integration in the Philippines. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(3), 68-79.
Carreon, O., Tan, D., & Bernardo, A. B. I. (2019). Professional development needs of public school teachers in the Philippines: Self-assessment of knowledge, skills, and attitudes on technology integration. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(2), 237-247.
Classroom. Retrieved from https://edtechmagazine.com
Colorado Department of Education. (2017). Educator Effectiveness Office. Retrieved
Communications and Technology (4th ed.). Springer-Verlag.
Computational Thinking Concept Into Digital Storytelling to Improve Learners’ Motivation and Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 470-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120967315
Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Teaching as a Profession: Lessons in Teacher
Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). How They Do It Abroad. Time, 171, 34.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
DeMonte, J. (2017, September 13). Micro-Credentials for Teachers: What Three
Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best Practices in Teachers’ Professional
Development and Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Research Literature. Computer Science Education, 33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1993666.
Diem, K. G., & Moyer, B. C. (2015). Educational research and cluster sampling techniques in practical settings. Educational Journal of Applied Research, 42(3), 217-223.
Early Adopters Have Learned So Far.
EdTech Magazine. (2023). How Upgraded Technology Supports Teachers in the
Education Articles. (2023). The Importance of Staying Updated on Technology in
Education. Retrieved from https://education-articles.com
Educational Leadership, 62(5), 56.
Edutopia. (2023). Integrating Instructional Strategies with Technology. Retrieved
El-Hamamsy, L., Bruno, B., Avry, S., Chessel-Lazzarotto, F., Dehler Zufferey, J., &
Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook of Research on Educational
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
Fisher, J. B., Schumaker, J. B., Culbertson, J., & Deshler, D. D. (2010). Effects of a
Foundation for Young Australians. (2017). The New Basics: Big Data Reveals the
from http://www.cde.state.co.us/educatoreffectiveness
Fulton, K., Glenn, A., & Valdez, G. (2003). Three Preservice Programs Preparing
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2014). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4-14.
Hamlen Mansour, K., Jackson, D. K., Bievenue, L., Voight, A., & Sridhar, N. (2023).
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical
Indicators 2005: Education Trends in Perspective. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/wei-2005-16-en
Ingram, E., Litzler, E., Margherio, C., Doten-Snitker, K., & Williams, J. (2021). The
International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific (pp. 1-19). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
Kim, P., Mims, C., & Holmes, K. (2006). An introduction to current trends and benefits of classroom technology integration. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 242-256.
Lifelong Learning. The Value of the Difference and Lifelong Learning in Contemporary Pedagogy, 113.
Ni, L., Bausch, G., & Benjamin, R. (2021). Computer Science Teacher Professional
OECD. (2018). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 results: Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners (Vol. I). OECD Publishing.
OECD/UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2005). Philippines. In World Education
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). Students,
Parsazadeh, N., Cheng, P.-Y., Wu, T.-T., & Huang, Y.-M. (2021). Integrating
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pena-Reyes, M. (2022). Distribution of teachers by demographic profile: Analysis of age, gender, civil status, and income. International Scholarly Research & Reviews. Retrieved from https://isrgpublishers.com
Philippine Statistics Authority. (2021). Gender and development: Updated core indicators and socio-economic data on women and men in the Philippines. Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph
Rodero, L. G. (2023). The European Digital Education Plan for the Development of
Schleicher, A. (2018). Professional Development in Finland and Singapore.
Schleicher, A. (2022). Lessons from High-Performing School Systems. In
Siefert, K. H., & Sutton, R. E. (2009). Educational Psychology. McGraw-Hill.
Skills Young People Need for the New Work Order.
Tai, S. Y. (2015). Teaching Pre-Service Teachers to Integrate Serious Games in the
Teachers Developing a New Image of Themselves and Their Workplace. Educational Research, 44(3), 237-254.
Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. W. (1998). Peer-Assisted Learning. Lawrence Erlbaum
Understanding the Impact of Peer Instruction in CS Principles Teacher Professional Development. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 23(2), Article 24, 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585077.
UNESCO. (2012). ICT competency standards for teachers. Paris: UNESCO.